-
Antonio Cosentino
- Male
- Victoria
- Australia
- Share
- Share on Twitter
- Share on Facebook
- Blog Posts
- Discussions (1)
- Events
- Groups (3)
- Videos (2)
Antonio Cosentino's Groups
-
Australian Cloud Azure U…
3 members
-
Orange County Azure User…
39 members
-
New York Azure User Group
55 members
Hola, Antonio Cosentino!
Gifts Received
Antonio Cosentino has not received any gifts yet
Company website
Latest Activity
How does cloud computing affect the Australian I.T landscape?
The Orange County, California local chapter of the Azure Cloud Computing User Group
New York Azure User Group
Does anyone know if DNN will be migrated to the cloud computing concept? We build comerical web sites in DNN, but see no path in this direction as yet.
Company site: www.landscapesinmotion.com.au/webconstruction
Antonio Cosentino's Videos
-
-
Azure Under the Hood
Added by Antonio Cosentino
About
Latest Activity
March SLC Azure User Group Meeting at New Horizons Learning Center
March 17, 2010 from 6pm to 8:30pm
Join us on March 17th for the SLC Azure User Group meeting. We will be meeting at the same time and place as always (6:00 – 8:30 PM at the Salt Lake City New Horizons Learning Center). This month we will continue to cover the Windows Azure AppFabric…
New York Azure User Group
March SLC Azure User Group Meeting at New Horizons Learning Center
March 17, 2010 from 6pm to 8:30pm
Join us on March 17th for the SLC Azure User Group meeting. We will be meeting at the same time and place as always (6:00 – 8:30 PM at the Salt Lake City New Horizons Learning Center). This month we will continue to cover the Windows Azure AppFabric…
© 2010 Created by Azure Admin on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
Comment Wall (5 comments)
You need to be a member of Azure User Group to add comments!
Join Azure User Group
HELLO
My name is miss Rose i saw your profile today at(azureusergroup.com) and fund you worthy to be mine as some one whom i can lay on his arms as long as love is concern, caring and teassing you all the nightlong and ,l will also like to know you the more,and l want you to send an email to my email address (rose.davids@hotmail.fr) so l can give you my picture for you to know whom l am. Here is my email address I believe we can move from here! I waiting for your mail to my email address above. miss Rose
(Remeber the distance or colour does not matter but love matters alot in life)
Somegroup owns that
you keep repeating this and different groups take ownership of those flows.
therefore some flow that generates value for the business is directly tied to its technical implementation
operation and ownership. in a very specific way.
the organization as a whole has an architecture group and they try to flesh out things that seem to be actually repeating in the business and sees if it is financially/technically feasable run it themselves and provide it back to all the groups as a service.
at the end of the day that might make it way easier to chop up or merge your business with others because the technology flows map closely to the flows of the business.
you could draw a circle around some groups and put a Security Token Service in front of them.
you can move some of those circles behind new firewalls and put service bus between them.
you could host entrypoints on premise with Dublin(appfabric)
you could imagine a set of tools built on Oslo modeling that lets you "move these circles and thier components around from on premise to the cloud and autoprovision the S+S of it all.
i call this Business Oriented Architecture or Just In Time Service Oriented Architecture lol.
When we create software its supposed to server a specific purpose.. overgeneralizing it gives you flexibility but moves you away from that purpose.
SOA is the ultimate overgeneralization?
what makes it worse than the application level is that in SOA everything is so distributed
and things are changing, competing interests, technology evolutions, politics and financials of the system etc etc...
I think the way it should be done is more like .... i dunno...
lets call it Just In Time SOA.
Lets say you are in business and some market change happens you want to take advantage of.
This might require building/buying/reconfiguring existing systems and tying them all together to form some chain of business capabilities that I.T. makes go.
you build that in the SOA way.
Using the best technologies available at that time for each of the components.
Somegroup owns that
And that's thing thing isn't it? Lets what exactly?
Lets go cloud computing? Lets go Web 2.0? Lets go mash-ups? Or whatever. Thing is will any of these turn out any different to the perceived failure of SOA in 5 years time? Why would they? Most of these concepts borrow from SOA ideas which were based on ideas that came before that.
SOA/Distributed-computing/Web 2.0/Mash-ups/Cloud-computing/yada-yada-yada all need an architecture rather than the "let's go buy some software, do our project and be heroes". In fact this attitude is what created the mess that SOA et. al. was born to fix.
* Most organizations that I've seen with are using service-oriented middleware to do integration (SOI rather than SOA). Very few companies are actually re-architecting their systems...
The SOA goal however, needs to be the rationalisation of IT. Effort needs to be applied to streamline the business process by reducing the complexity and the application and data layers.
I am reminded of an old adage "a poor workman blames his tools". Doesn't matter how good the tools are - if you start building without a planed architecture - the SOA journey will end abruptly!